Appeals court appears to reject Trump claims of records ownership
A federal appeals court appeared poised to reject the Trump administration's assertion that a law regulating presidential records is unconstitutional.
ARCHIVED · 2 LEFT · 1 CENTER · 0 RIGHT · Oct 17, 1:21 AM
Alter Net and UPI describe the same event in different terms.
30-SECOND READ
WORDING GAP
3 sources · 2 bias buckets · Medium confidence
Still Watching. The left frames it as "Appeals Court Questions Justice Dept. Claim that Trump Owns White House Records". The center frames it as "Appeals court appears to reject Trump claims of records ownership".
SOURCE MAP TIMELINE
Oct 16, 9:47 PM: New York Times Politics joined the source map.
Oct 17, 12:00 AM: AlterNet joined the source map.
Oct 17, 12:03 AM: UPI joined the source map.
Now: Wording Gap is 80/99 and story health is live match · 3 sources · 2 buckets · comparable news format.
ARCHIVED SOURCES
A federal appeals court appeared poised to reject the Trump administration's assertion that a law regulating presidential records is unconstitutional.
Politico reports a federal appeals court panel sounded “deeply skeptical” Friday about President Donald Trump’s bid to invalidate a Watergate-era law that governs presidential records — one...
A three-judge panel appeared unconvinced by claims that a federal law requiring the president to preserve and hand over his presidential papers was unconstitutional.