How Trump’s New Counterterrorism Strategy Puts You at Risk
The Intercept annotated the White House document to show how the U. S. government is bringing its war on terror home.
1 LEFT · 1 CENTER · 0 RIGHT · 11h ago
The Intercept and Foreign Policy frame the same story with noticeably different headline language.

IN 30 SECONDS
MAIN REPORTED CLAIM
WHAT CHANGED
The Intercept leads with "How Trump’s New Counterterrorism Strategy Puts You at Risk" while Foreign Policy leads with "What Makes Trump’s New Counterterrorism Strategy So Alarming".
The source map is still incomplete. The wording gap is useful, but it needs more coverage from the missing bucket before it should drive a strong conclusion.
Most worrisome are the terrorist threats missing from the document.
How this could be misread: A high Wording Gap does not prove one side is wrong. It means the headline language creates a different first impression.
SOURCE MAP CHANGES
May 15, 4:01 AM: Foreign Policy joined the source map.
May 15, 11:08 AM: The Intercept joined the source map.
Now: Wording Gap is 60/99 and story health is developing · 2 sources · 2 buckets.
WHAT EACH SIDE EMPHASIZES
The Intercept · Left · News report
Foreign Policy · Center · News report
Optics keeps watching for pickup.
VISIBLE SOURCES
The Intercept annotated the White House document to show how the U. S. government is bringing its war on terror home.
Most worrisome are the terrorist threats missing from the document.